Skip to main content

How would you describe Gulliver's character based on his experience with the Lilliputians and Blefuscudians?

Based on some of his experiences with the Lilliputians, Gulliver is revealed to be rather dim-witted.  He cannot understand the ways in which his behavior -- especially urinating on the castle in order to put out a fire -- might be considered offensive to his hosts.  However, in many ways, the Lilliputians are, figuratively, so small (and warlike and aggressive) that Gulliver seems practically virtuous by comparison.  The Lilliputians have fought countless wars over something as silly as whether to break eggs at the big end or the small end, and many citizens have died over this issue.  Gulliver, quite reasonably, suggests that each person ought to be able to decide for himself without fear of persecution.  Moreover, when Gulliver refuses the emperor of Lilliput's request that he decimate the Blefuscudian fleet, he shows himself to be rather fair and just.  He will not allow himself to be used as a tool to enslave others, and he risks personal danger in doing so.  As a result of his interactions in this part of the book, Gulliver seems fairly reasonable (if a little tone-deaf, socially), unlike the way he appears in comparison to the Brobdingnagians.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more