Skip to main content

What effect did Depth Charges have on WW1 and how did they change warfare?

The depth charge was invented in 1916 by British naval engineer Herbert Taylor.  His "hydrostatic pistol" could be launched out of a ship and detonated at a predetermined depth, hence the name "depth charge."  Herbert designed this weapon to combat the U-boat menace against British shipping.  The depth charge was designed to cause submarines to leak and force them to surface, where they could be shot or rammed by surface vessels.  During WWI, depth charges are credited with destroying twenty submarines.  Germany utilized 390 submarines during WWI.  


The depth charge was a defensive counter against submarines who did not have to surface in order to sink ships.  By the end of the war, Americans developed ways to launch depth charges farther from ships thus placing them closer to their targets.  Depth charge technology improved and more submarines were destroyed due to depth charges than by mines in WWII.  Submarines in WWII were also built sturdier in order to better withstand attack.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more