A charter colony is a self-governing entity in which the king grants a charter to a company to establish a colony in the Americas. The king would do this so that he did not have to spend the country's money on a risky endeavor. Companies like the Virginia Company, would seek investors for the project and establish colonies like the one at Jamestown. The king did not have any political authority over this entity. A royal colony, on the other hand, was ruled directly or indirectly by the king. Jamestown was established as a charter in 1606 and was granted by King James I. The king wanted the colonists to convert the natives to Christianity, while the company hoped to reap a profit from gold. What the company found was that the region did not have vast reserves of gold and it was difficult to even sustain the population with food and protect itself from Indian attacks. After a vicious string of Indian attacks known as the Powhatan Uprising, the king revoked the charter in 1624 and established the colony as a royal colony.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment