Skip to main content

A bullet is fired horizontally from a gun at exactly the same time that a similar bullet is allowed to fall to the ground from the same height....

This is the sort of question that is better answered through experiment than theory, since it's fairly simple to test and would provide an actual answer instead of a hypothesis. I've linked a clip from a television program in which this experiment was conducted, and confirmed the prediction that we would derive from math: both bullets hit the ground at the same time.


This probably seems counter-intuitive because we think that, by traveling so much faster, the fired bullet must have some kind of different property relating to its vertical speed. In fact, the horizontal speed of the fired bullet is a completely different property, unrelated to gravity, that only determines how far the bullet is able to travel in a given amount of time. This is why muzzle velocity and elevation are so important in determining the strategic uses of various firearms.


Mathematically, we could use the equation X = Vi - .5at^2 to solve this;


The initial speed of both bullets is 0 (they are at rest relative to the ground), so the equation simplifies to X = -.5at^2


a is 9.8m/s on average, so half of that becomes 4.9


We could assign any value to X, so in this example I'll say it's 1.5 meters, the height of a reasonably sized person.


1.5 = 4.9t^2


therefore, t = 0.55 seconds


This seems like a pretty short timespan, but considering that a modern gun can fire over 1000m/s, this means the fired bullet will be over 500 meters, or 1500 feet, away from you by the time it hits the ground.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more