Skip to main content

Can I consider television, music, and video games the most important aspects of popular culture?

Television, music, and video games are significant forms of popular culture, but the internet might even be more significant because of social media and the ways people can interact on the internet. 


Popular culture is what ordinary people care about and is influenced, if not created, by mass media. Social media is definitely a part of mass media, since social media is based on an intersection between corporate media producers (e.g., Facebook corporation and Google corporation) and ordinary people. In fact, the internet media is so powerful that we have a name for ideas that enter popular culture through this means: "viral memes." Look at the "ice bucket challenge" and see how this meme ran through social media for awhile; people influenced others' behavior by challenging their friends to dump ice water on their heads. 


It is likely that social media is more powerful than television and music because social media websites invite active participation from users. Even video games often have a social media element to them when it comes to playing them online. This could be very powerful for youngsters in juvenile detention, since first-person shooting games give young men, in particular, a sense of power. 


When working with young people, it is critical to know and understand the social media they are using, including those associated with video games. A few years ago, Facebook was really popular with college-aged students. Now, this age group may be more likely to use Twitter, Snapchat, or Instagram. 


Research is only as powerful as it is able to represent the realities of the research subjects. Today's youth are involved in a much larger range of popular media than youth were even ten years ago, and this involvement evolves quickly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.