Skip to main content

Can I consider television, music, and video games the most important aspects of popular culture?

Television, music, and video games are significant forms of popular culture, but the internet might even be more significant because of social media and the ways people can interact on the internet. 


Popular culture is what ordinary people care about and is influenced, if not created, by mass media. Social media is definitely a part of mass media, since social media is based on an intersection between corporate media producers (e.g., Facebook corporation and Google corporation) and ordinary people. In fact, the internet media is so powerful that we have a name for ideas that enter popular culture through this means: "viral memes." Look at the "ice bucket challenge" and see how this meme ran through social media for awhile; people influenced others' behavior by challenging their friends to dump ice water on their heads. 


It is likely that social media is more powerful than television and music because social media websites invite active participation from users. Even video games often have a social media element to them when it comes to playing them online. This could be very powerful for youngsters in juvenile detention, since first-person shooting games give young men, in particular, a sense of power. 


When working with young people, it is critical to know and understand the social media they are using, including those associated with video games. A few years ago, Facebook was really popular with college-aged students. Now, this age group may be more likely to use Twitter, Snapchat, or Instagram. 


Research is only as powerful as it is able to represent the realities of the research subjects. Today's youth are involved in a much larger range of popular media than youth were even ten years ago, and this involvement evolves quickly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...