Skip to main content

What do Tess's words and actions say about the village and the nature of the ritual in "The Lottery"?

Most of the words that come out of Tessie Hutchinson's mouth are basically complaints about the fairness of the process of the lottery. That, in itself, shows the asinine nature of the practice, and the equally ignorant nature of the followers of such practice. It is clear the villagers cannot be bright and independent thinkers, otherwise this ridiculous tradition would have never become a reality in the first place. Also, if the villagers were rational beings, the lottery would have been abolished by the common sense of the people. Instead, we see the opposite.


The villagers are entirely bound to the macabre tradition of the lottery. Their day depends on it. There are roles to be followed in the process, and there are no questions raised prior to the moment when it is the turn of the "winner" to die. Still, it is admitted in the story that the villagers do not quite know why they are really doing the lottery.



Although the villagers had forgotten the ritual and lost the original black box, they still remembered to use stones. The pile of stones the boys had made earlier was ready; there were stones on the ground with the blowing scraps of paper that had come out of the box Delacroix selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands and turned to Mrs. Dunbar. "Come on," she said. "Hurry up.



Tess's words of "It's not fair," reflect the blindness of following a practice for the sake of following. It also reflects the villagers' selfishness: Notice how Tess does not say anything about the fairness, or lack of fairness, of the lottery until the name of her family comes up, and until it is her turn to be stoned to death. Perhaps it has been the same with all the other villagers who also thought, like Tess, that the lottery "was not fair" when it was all too late.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.