Skip to main content

What are some interesting facts about processed food in Michael Pollan's book The Omnivore's Dilemma, and what are the effects of this type of...

On page 17 of The Omnivore's Dilemma, Pollan says that a consumer has "to be a fairly determined ecological detective" to figure out where processed food comes from, while it is easier to determine the origin of less or non-processed food. When he traced the long food chains of processed food (meaning determining where they came from), he found that many of them go back to the American Corn Belt and a single species called the Zea mays, or corn. For example, most cows, chickens, pigs, and even fish such as salmon feed on corn. In addition, processed food such as chicken nuggets are made up of chicken that has been fed on corn combined with corn (see page 18). The chicken nugget is fried in corn oil and mixed with corn flour. The additives, preservatives, and colorings also come from corn. Since the 1980s, most sodas and fruit drinks have been sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). As Pollan says on page 95, processing food can add months or even years to its shelf life, increasing the profit for the producer and giving the food a global market. 


The hormones and antibiotics in these foods contaminate the environment. On page 81, Pollan explains that since we share the same ecosystem as the animals, what they eat affects us. As corn makes cows less healthy, so it also makes us less healthy. Animals are fed so many antibiotics that these antibiotics, either in food or in the soil that is used to grow other food, can make humans more resistant to new strains of bacteria. In addition, cattle raised in feedlots contain a strain of E. coli that can be toxic to humans. Everything added to food or used to feed animals winds up in the ecosystem and affects the environment and our health.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more