Skip to main content

What are some reasons why southerners might oppose the secession?

After Abraham Lincoln won the election of 1860, eleven southern states seceded from the Union. While they had various reasons for doing this, there were also good reasons why some southerners might have been opposed to secession.


One reason why southerners might have opposed secession was that the odds of the South winning the Civil War were very low. The North had many advantages over the South. The North had more people, more minerals, more miles of railroad tracks, more factories, and more weapons. The North also had an established government with a brilliant leader. These advantages would make it very hard for the South to defeat the North.


The South also didn’t have support from the European countries. The Europeans weren’t willing to risk angering the Union by the supporting the South. Since the odds were against the South winning the war, the European countries withheld their support from the Confederacy. The Europeans wanted to see if the South could win a significant battle in the North before considering offering support to the South. That victory never occurred.


Another factor in opposing secession is that the southern war strategy would have led to a long war and would have had most of the fighting occurring in the South. This could leave the South in ruins after the Civil War ended. There also would be a substantial loss of life on both sides, and there were people who felt that was too big of a price to pay.


Some southerners were concerned about the economic impact of a Civil War. Some southerners depended on the U.S. government for their jobs. These people would lose their job if the South seceded. The South would also have to establish its own financial system. There could be significant issues with debt and with inflation as the South tried to develop their financial system. The southern economy also might struggle if the North imposed an effective economic blockade on the South.


There were reasons why some southerners could have opposed secession.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...