Skip to main content

Based on Chapters 5-9 of Ian Haney López's Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle...

In his book Racism on Trial: The Chicano Fight for Justice, Haney Lopez defines common sense racism as "action arising out of racial common sense that furthers social hierarchy" (page 128). Common sense racism does not necessarily have the intention of doing harm, as overt racism does, but it still results in helping keep whites on top of the social hierarchy.


In his book Dog Whistle Politics, Haney Lopez writes that whites have some seemingly rational reasons to engage in common sense racism, but their belief is largely guided by "the delusion that that racial superiority will restore a mythical middle-class wonderland" (page 173). In other words, white working-class voters believe that their common sense racism will help restore their lost incomes and lost economic status. However, the reasons that whites support common sense racism runs deeper than that. As Lopez Haney writes, white working-class voters engage in commonsense racism, even if it overtly goes against their economic interests, because "what's economic and what's social cannot be neatly separated" (page 172). As the author explains, whites blame nonwhites for the economic hardships they have faced, and they use non-whites as a scapegoat for the larger economic forces that have caused recessions, job losses, declining opportunities, and shrinking savings. Common sense racism allows working-class whites to hold onto the myth that they will regain economic ground, and working class whites' cognitive response to the economic situation is not always rational.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more