Skip to main content

What is the structure of the Waknuk society in the book The Chrysalids?

Waknuk was founded by David's grandfather, who was driven by "the ungodly ways of the East" to make a better society.  He developed the first district in Waknuk, and relied heavily on the Bible and "Nicholson's Repentances" to form his new society.  He was a farmer, and settled down.  Others followed, and a small farming settlement gathered around him there.  



The place may have been called Waknuk then; anyway, Waknuk it had become; an orderly, law-abiding, God-respecting community of some hundred scattered holdings, large and small. (Ch. 2)



Waknuk relies on ensuring order through a strict religious doctrine.  This is enforced through inspectors, who know what the True Image looks like and provide certificates to certify it.  Everything needs to conform to the True Image, from livestock and crops to infant humans.  When a baby is born, it has to be inspected and given a Normalcy Certificate.


Waknuk is divided into districts.  All of them follow this same principle.  The area outside the districts is known as the Fringes.  If someone does not fit the True Image, they end up there.  It is a horrible place.



‘… Man alive, you'd not want to go to the Fringes. Why, they've got nothing there — not even enough food. Most of them are half starving, that's why they make the raids. No, you'd spend all the time there just trying to keep alive, and lucky if you did.' (Ch. 6) 



Beyond the Fringes is the Badlands, which no one knows anything about, according to David.  He says that anyone who goes into the Badlands ends up dying there.  The Deviants who live in the Fringes sometimes cause trouble.  They are society’s outcasts are and somewhat bitter about it, especially since they are sterilized before being kicked out. They are led by David’s uncle, “Spider,” whose arms are supposedly too long.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more