Skip to main content

grammaticality - Is it correct to say "we start tomorrow"?


Here's an example of a short conversation between me and a native speaker via text messages:


A: I'm so exited for this app
B: Yeah, me too
A: We start tomorrow
B: OK

Shouldn't it be "We are starting tomorrow"?!



Answer



No, it doesn't need to be we are starting tomorrow


In a very brief and general way, there are four ways to talk about the future in English:




  • Using will as in I will answer the door. This is usually used for instantaneous decisions.




  • Using going to as in I am going to buy a new car. This is usually used for plans.




  • Using present continuous as in I am buying a new car. This is usually used for arrangements.




  • Using present simple, as in I get my new car this afternoon! This is usually used for things that are scheduled or on a timetable.




As a sequence, you decide you need a new car - I'll buy a car; then you tell everybody about your plan - I'm going to buy a car; then you go to the showroom, pick one out, and arrange to pay for it - I am buying a new car; then everything is finalised and they tell you the date and time when you can go to collect it - I get my new car next week.


This is not a random thing. It does make sense. Will because it is your will that you should have a car. Think of writing a will before you die. Going to because you have a target - a new car - that you are moving towards. Present continuous because you have begun the process of obtaining a new car. Present simple when it has become as good as a fact.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.