Skip to main content

modal verbs - How to use would or could in English?





When should we use “can”, “could”, “will”, “would”?



I am not a native English speaker and this would/could thing always bothers me. Please give some example + explanation on this. Sorry if the question is too naive.



Answer



"Would" and "could" really cover different situations, although both can be used to make a request.


"Could" generally denotes:



  • Possibility (either "basic" posibility on a particular occasion, or "supposed" possibility): "It could rain this afternoon", "They could be planning an attack"

  • Equivalent of "can" (possibility) in the indirect speech: "He said he could come".

  • To formulate a request: "Could you get the shopping for me?"


Note that "could" doesn't tend to denote a possibility that is "generally true"; in this case, "can" is used (contrast "it could rain this afternoon" with "it can rain heavily this time of year").


On the other hand, "would" generally denotes:



  • The result of a condition being fulfilled: "I would spend more time with my children, but I have to work"; "it would be great if you could come"

  • The notion of future-in-the-past, effectively the equivalent of "will" in indirect speech: "He said he would come"

  • In the negative, to denote a refusal in the past: "He wouldn't help me" = "He didn't want to help me"; "The car wouldn't start" = "The car refused to start". But note that this is just in the negative: people don't say "*He would help me" to mean "He offered/accepted to help me".

  • To formulate a request: "Would you come here a minute?"

  • In slightly literary use, an equivalent of "used to": "On Saturdays, she would spend the whole day staring out of the window"


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.