Skip to main content

What is the exact meaning of ‘lackadaisical’ in describing the Magliozzis who joked they were about to get “even lazier”


New York Times (June 8) reported that “Hosts of ‘Car Talk’ to retire after 35 years of automotive banter.” and commented that:



“The Magliozzis are the kind of people who wouldn’t care. Famously lackadaisical, they joked on Friday that they were about to get “even lazier.”



Cambridge online dictionary defines ‘lackadaisical’ as ‘showing little enthusiasm and effort,’ and OALD defines it as ‘not showing enough care or enthusiasm.’


According to these definitions, Magliozzi brothers look like being unenthusiastic and ‘famously lazy’ in keeping their show run. Could it be possible for ‘unenthusiastic and effortless’ (even superficially) hosts to have maintained one of the longest running radio talk shows in the United States?


Should I take the meaning of ‘lackadaisical’ as literally as both Cambridge and OALD define? What is the exact meaning of ‘lackadaisical’ being used here?



Answer



This question is a great example of why context is so important when interpreting language. As I mentioned in one of my comments, and as JLG said in his answer, these brothers are very famously self-deprecating; it's part of their shtick. From a recent show (this is paraphrased):



Caller: I'm kind of embarrassed to say this...
Host: Go ahead and tell us – no one's listening to the show anyway.



They end each broadcast by announcing, "You've wasted another perfectly good hour listening to Car Talk" before thanking their sponsors, and then ultimately finishing with this inevitable quip:



Ray: And remember, don't drive like my brother.
Tommy: And don't drive like my brother.



As another example of how they make fun of themselves, each week's show includes a "Puzzler" – a brain-teaser of shorts. In the written version of the puzzler (found on the show's website), the puzzler reads:



You begin to paddle upstream. You get a mile from where you put your boat in the water, and your hat flies off. You say, "Ah, forget it!" You keep rowing.



Yet, when they presented the puzzler during their show (here's the podcast), they say:



...your hat flies off. It's just a Car Talk hat, so you say, "Ah, forget it!" You keep rowing.



Understanding how these two hosts continuously make fun of themselves during their broadcasts is key to appreciating the gibe in their announcement: retirement is a chance for them to get "even lazier" (as if they'd never been working hard anyway). The reporter, merely "going along" with the act, proceeds to call them "famously lackadaisical," creating a one-liner that's almost sure to bring a knowing smile to the face of any regular listener.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.