Skip to main content

etymology - Origins of the "‑cede/‑sede/‑ceed" suffix


Somewhere in the back of my mind I seem to remember that cedere meant “to go or yield” in Latin. Presumably this gives us the words concede and accede. (?)


But what about the words supersede and proceed? Are they derived from the same source? If so, why the different spelling?



Answer



The different spelling of 'supersede' is appropriate because it is not derived from the same source as the others.


Supersede is derived from super (over) + sedere (to sit).
Proceed is derived from pro (forward) + cedere (to go).


Here is a comment from the Oxford dictionary on the spelling confusion of supersede:



The standard spelling is supersede rather than supercede. The word is derived from the Latin verb supersedere but has been influenced by the presence of other words in English spelled with a c, such as intercede and accede. The c spelling is recorded as early as the 16th century; although still generally regarded as incorrect, it is now entered without comment in some modern dictionaries



The -ceed/-cede suffixes are just spelling variations, all having derived from the verb cedere (to go/yield). The variation used appears to depend on the period that the word entered the English language:



  • exceed; 1325-75

  • succeed; 1325-75

  • proceed; 1350-1400

  • accede; 1400-50

  • recede; 1470–80

  • concede; 1625–35


There is one more exception that has nothing to do with Latin: the past tense of the informal verb to emcee is spelled emceed.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more