Skip to main content

word choice - "Got it at" or "Got it in?"


If someone asked you where you bought something, you could say,



I got it at Walmart.



but what if instead of referring to a store you were referring to a city?


Would you say,



I got it at Chicago.



or



I got it in Chicago.



Somehow when referring to a city, using "in" instead of "at" seems more appropriate. Am I right? Why is that?



Answer



Walmart and Chicago are both places, but we use different prepositions to refer to them. From this article on them:



Prepositions of Place: at, on, and in


We use at for specific addresses. Grammar English lives at 55 Boretz Road in Durham.


We use on to designate names of streets, avenues, etc. Her house is on Boretz Road.


And we use in for the names of land-areas (towns, counties, states, countries, and continents).


She lives in Durham.


Durham is in Windham County.


Windham County is in Connecticut.



Because Walmart is a specific place or address, we say that someone shops at Walmart. However, since Chicago is a land-area, we say that someone shops in Chicago.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more