Skip to main content

modal verbs - When is "will" used in an "if" clause?


Given the following sentences that use will in the if clause (which is seldom with if-clauses and therefore, I'm not sure they all are even grammatical or not).




  • If you will/would kindly lend me your book, I will be thankful to you.

  • If you will not/would not mind lending me your book, I will be thankful to you.

  • If you will/would wait for a while, I will check it for you.







  • If you will use it, you can have it

  • If you will not arrive before six o'clock, I cannot meet you.



What if the last sentence is modified as follows?



If you will not be arriving before six o'clock, I cannot meet you.



Once upon a time, it was found in a grammar book.





If the play will not be finished until ten o'clock, I will have to spend the night at your place.



Can the following version of this sentence have a different meaning (or no meaning at all — a wrong sense)?



If the play is not going to be finished until ten o'clock, I will have to spend the night at your place.



After all, the question is when is will used in if-clauses as the title implies?




Moreover, both the following sentences appear to indicate a probable condition.




  • If he came, I should help him.

  • If he came, I would help him.



Using should and would interchangeably in such contexts implies a significant difference in meaning?



Answer



There seem to be several questions here. I’ll answer the one in the title.


I believe foreign learners are taught, at least at the lower levels, that an if clause cannot contain the modal verb will . This is good advice as far as it goes. We have to say If you run, you will catch the train and not If you will run, you will catch the train. However . . .


Will (’ll) and won’t may be used in the if clause to express the possibility of willingness (or its absence) on the part the person addressed. It can be used as a form of politeness, as in If you ’ll come this way, I’ll show you a few samples. In its negative form it can be a threat, as in If you won’t try harder, I’m not going to help you.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...