Skip to main content

modal verbs - When is "will" used in an "if" clause?


Given the following sentences that use will in the if clause (which is seldom with if-clauses and therefore, I'm not sure they all are even grammatical or not).




  • If you will/would kindly lend me your book, I will be thankful to you.

  • If you will not/would not mind lending me your book, I will be thankful to you.

  • If you will/would wait for a while, I will check it for you.






  • If you will use it, you can have it

  • If you will not arrive before six o'clock, I cannot meet you.



What if the last sentence is modified as follows?



If you will not be arriving before six o'clock, I cannot meet you.



Once upon a time, it was found in a grammar book.




If the play will not be finished until ten o'clock, I will have to spend the night at your place.



Can the following version of this sentence have a different meaning (or no meaning at all — a wrong sense)?



If the play is not going to be finished until ten o'clock, I will have to spend the night at your place.



After all, the question is when is will used in if-clauses as the title implies?



Moreover, both the following sentences appear to indicate a probable condition.




  • If he came, I should help him.

  • If he came, I would help him.



Using should and would interchangeably in such contexts implies a significant difference in meaning?



Answer



There seem to be several questions here. I’ll answer the one in the title.


I believe foreign learners are taught, at least at the lower levels, that an if clause cannot contain the modal verb will . This is good advice as far as it goes. We have to say If you run, you will catch the train and not If you will run, you will catch the train. However . . .


Will (’ll) and won’t may be used in the if clause to express the possibility of willingness (or its absence) on the part the person addressed. It can be used as a form of politeness, as in If you ’ll come this way, I’ll show you a few samples. In its negative form it can be a threat, as in If you won’t try harder, I’m not going to help you.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more