Skip to main content

Aside from spelling, speech, vocabulary, and written language, how has Charlie Gordon gotten smater?

A fine question.


I would say first that the changes in spelling, language, and vocabulary are not changes in themselves, but symptoms or markers of the larger changes in Charlie's intellectual capacity.



That said, I'm going to be referring mainly to the original shorter version of the story as I address the other changes (rather than the later novel).



On March 23, Charlie starts to speculate in a more nuanced fashion about the future, wondering if Algernon might be smart for good.



On March 25, he shows a greater awareness of time (what takes time, and what saves time).



On March 28, he shows greater autonomy and will, pushing back against the doctors' instructions. This is continued soon after, when he looks up words on his own.



On April 6, Charlie beats Algernon for the first time. This indicates increased abilities in spatial reasoning and problem solving.



On April 20, he shows himself more able to evaluate social relationships, and notices his coworkers' mockery. He follows this with observations showing greater self-awareness.



By May, Charlie is able to make comparative judgments of others' intelligences.



In other words, his intelligence improves in multiple areas at once.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more