Skip to main content

In The Story of My Life, is Helen's childhood depicted as a happy one?

Helen’s early childhood was unhappy because after she lost her sight and hearing she could not communicate effectively. 


Helen had a hard time between the time she lost her sight and hearing as a toddler and the time she learned to communicate when Anne Sullivan taught her.  She knew that other people were able to communicate with words. Since she was a baby when she lost her hearing and knew few words, she could not.  This frustrated her. 



I had noticed that my mother and my friends did not use signs as I did when they wanted anything done, but talked with their mouths…. I could not understand, and was vexed. I moved my lips and gesticulated frantically without result. This made me so angry at times that I kicked and screamed until I was exhausted. (Ch. 2) 



Helen’s bad behavior as a child was a direct result of not understanding or being understood.  She was not a bad child.  She had an agile mind and enjoyed mischief.  She just could not express herself in ways that people understood. 


The other problem Helen had was that she suddenly had a little sister.  This would bother most young children, and when you do not understand everything that happens around you it causes additional friction.  That was Helen’s issue. 



For a long time I regarded my little sister as an intruder. I knew that I had ceased to be my mother's only darling, and the thought filled me with jealousy. She sat in my mother's lap constantly, where I used to sit, and seemed to take up all her care and time.  (Ch. 2)



Eventually Helen overcame having a little sister and Anne Sullivan came and taught her sign language.  However, the early days were days of darkness.  They were tough for little Helen Keller because she could not communicate.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more