Skip to main content

Why did President Herbert Hoover fail to set up government programs to help the homeless?

President Herbert Hoover, who presided over the United States during the leanest years of the Great Depression, was kind of a scapegoat for the whole decade.  Tens of thousands of homeless Americans built makeshift shelters in shantytowns.  These desperate communities came to be called Hoovervilles in a jab at the sitting president.  The reason that people were so unhappy about Hoover as president is that they did not feel he was doing enough with the power of the federal government to relieve their suffering.  In defense of Hoover, the federal government had never taken the role of a provider of benefits for the population.  The government's position was that charities and other philanthropic organizations should handle the plight of the poor.  The problem was that the Great Depression was so sever that charities could do very little to help.  Hoover believed wholeheartedly that Americans should help one another out of these problems and should be accountable for themselves and their families.  He felt that this was the quickest way to recovery.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.