Skip to main content

When writing a speech introduction for high school seniors concerning the process of applying to colleges, what are the best ways that you can grab...

Unfortunately, there is no single answer. I'll review the reason why, and some general principles, to help you start your speech.


The reason why there is no single answer is that there is no single audience of high school seniors. Imagine two different high schools. One is a well-funded magnet school where 90+% of the students go to college. The other is poorly funded, and is one of many schools in the United States where only 60% of the students graduate high school, let alone go on to college. Those two audiences need very different speeches and very different appeals.


Start your process by knowing your audience. In the first example, students assume they'll pass through the application process smoothly, and you mainly need to guide them in the best ways and away from dangerous mistakes. In the second, students likely assume college isn't for them at all. For that first audience, yes, statistics could be useful, if they are simple and focused. You want to grab and focus their attention. So, something like knowing which colleges students at the school apply to is essential, as well as what worked for them and why. You could try something like like this:



There are 450 students in this auditorium. If you're like last year's class, 320 of you will apply to University X. And half of you will get rejected. Half. That number can go down if you do the following when you start your college application process...



The second audience would likely need a less stark challenge, and would probably benefit from something encouraging. I would likely use a story about successful students from their high school who attended and did well in college to show them it is possible. I'd introduce the process of applying for college later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.