Skip to main content

How would you describe Scout's first grade classroom in To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee?

Scout's first day of first grade is described in chapters two and three. Her teacher is Miss Caroline Fisher, who hails from North Alabama and doesn't know Maycomb or her students very well. Miss Caroline's ignorance is first noticed by Scout when the class hears a story about cats. Scout comments as follows:



Miss Caroline seemed unaware that the ragged, denim-shirted, floursack-skirted first grade, most of whom had chopped cotton and fed hogs from the time they were able to walk, were immune to imaginative literature (16-17).



Not only does Scout point out how unaware her teacher is, but she also describes her classmates in the above passage. These are kids who struggle under the Great Depression and the effects of an impoverished lifestyle. Specifically, the chapters chronicle the Cunninghams and the Ewells, as represented by Walter Cunningham Jr. and Burris Ewell.


Walter doesn't have any money for lunch, causing Miss Caroline to cross a line unknowingly by offering him a quarter and expecting him to pay it back. She then attempts to tell Burris to take a bath before coming back to school the next day, and he makes her cry by verbally disrespecting her in front of the class. He also scares her with how much lice he has crawling out of his head (which he then eats).


There are also students who have repeated the first grade a couple of times. Walter is one of them, which he explains to Atticus is because he hasn't been able to finish school each year because his family needs him on the farm. Scout's classroom is a mix of well-bred, middle-class kids and poorer, suffering kids. Most of the kids show up to the first day of first grade dirty, hungry, and illiterate. Scout, on the other hand, is privileged because she enters first grade already reading, with a full stomach, and wearing clean clothes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.