Skip to main content

What are some of the basic principles of the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution?

What are some of the basic principles of the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution?


Taking its cue from the blossoming Scientific Revolution's of the 16th and 17th centuries, the Age of Enlightenment set out to restructure philosophy, politics, and society on totally new foundations.


The many successes of new scientific inquiries into avenues such as astronomy and cosmology; chemistry; physics; and mathematics by thinkers such as Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Leibniz, and Descartes had laid the foundation for a radically new and different view of the world than the one passed down from the medieval era and the middle ages.


Starting with Descartes publications of the Discourse on Method (1637) and Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) and continuing roughly through Immanuel Kant's publication of the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787), Enlightenment thinkers set out to explicate these new first principles. These included the quest for scientific certainty and empirical verifiability as the foundations of truth and knowledge. Instead of accepting the arguments of faith or belief handed down to them by the State or the Church, Enlightenment thinkers sought natural explanations for how or why things occurred the way they did. 


Another major principle was the use of scientific reason and experiment as the guiding force of all inquiry; and this reason was universal. All human beings were seen as rational agents capable of achieving enlightenment. These principles did not only apply to science, but to politics and society as well. Because of their belief in universal reason, rights, and the progress of science to make a better world, Enlightenment thinkers challenged the dominant political and social orders. These orders had been based on rigid nobility and inequality which were supposedly bestowed by God (i.e., the divine right of kings), thus ushering in a new era of democratic thinking.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...