Skip to main content

What are some of the basic principles of the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution?

What are some of the basic principles of the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution?


Taking its cue from the blossoming Scientific Revolution's of the 16th and 17th centuries, the Age of Enlightenment set out to restructure philosophy, politics, and society on totally new foundations.


The many successes of new scientific inquiries into avenues such as astronomy and cosmology; chemistry; physics; and mathematics by thinkers such as Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Leibniz, and Descartes had laid the foundation for a radically new and different view of the world than the one passed down from the medieval era and the middle ages.


Starting with Descartes publications of the Discourse on Method (1637) and Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) and continuing roughly through Immanuel Kant's publication of the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787), Enlightenment thinkers set out to explicate these new first principles. These included the quest for scientific certainty and empirical verifiability as the foundations of truth and knowledge. Instead of accepting the arguments of faith or belief handed down to them by the State or the Church, Enlightenment thinkers sought natural explanations for how or why things occurred the way they did. 


Another major principle was the use of scientific reason and experiment as the guiding force of all inquiry; and this reason was universal. All human beings were seen as rational agents capable of achieving enlightenment. These principles did not only apply to science, but to politics and society as well. Because of their belief in universal reason, rights, and the progress of science to make a better world, Enlightenment thinkers challenged the dominant political and social orders. These orders had been based on rigid nobility and inequality which were supposedly bestowed by God (i.e., the divine right of kings), thus ushering in a new era of democratic thinking.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...