Skip to main content

What are some of the basic principles of the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution?

What are some of the basic principles of the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution?


Taking its cue from the blossoming Scientific Revolution's of the 16th and 17th centuries, the Age of Enlightenment set out to restructure philosophy, politics, and society on totally new foundations.


The many successes of new scientific inquiries into avenues such as astronomy and cosmology; chemistry; physics; and mathematics by thinkers such as Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Leibniz, and Descartes had laid the foundation for a radically new and different view of the world than the one passed down from the medieval era and the middle ages.


Starting with Descartes publications of the Discourse on Method (1637) and Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) and continuing roughly through Immanuel Kant's publication of the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787), Enlightenment thinkers set out to explicate these new first principles. These included the quest for scientific certainty and empirical verifiability as the foundations of truth and knowledge. Instead of accepting the arguments of faith or belief handed down to them by the State or the Church, Enlightenment thinkers sought natural explanations for how or why things occurred the way they did. 


Another major principle was the use of scientific reason and experiment as the guiding force of all inquiry; and this reason was universal. All human beings were seen as rational agents capable of achieving enlightenment. These principles did not only apply to science, but to politics and society as well. Because of their belief in universal reason, rights, and the progress of science to make a better world, Enlightenment thinkers challenged the dominant political and social orders. These orders had been based on rigid nobility and inequality which were supposedly bestowed by God (i.e., the divine right of kings), thus ushering in a new era of democratic thinking.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more