Skip to main content

What is the tone in Nadine Gordimer's "Once upon a Time"?

Two separate tones are evident in Nadine Gordimer's short story: one for the frame story and one for the bedtime story. In the frame story, readers can discern a tone of nervous resignation that comes from assuming corporate guilt despite one's personal innocence. Presumably, the narrator does not subscribe to the racial prejudice and exploitation of people of color that characterizes her society. Although she is white and privileged, she doesn't relish her status, knowing it has been built on the foundation of apartheid, a system that is at that moment undermining the stability of her culture just as the goldmine is causing her home to shift and buckle. She fears civic unrest, but she hasn't barred her windows or purchased a handgun to protect herself. Some "voice in the echo-chamber of the subconscious" tells her that if she becomes a victim of the exploited classes, it will not be completely without cause. 


The tone of the bedtime story, on the other hand, is ironic. As the narrator relates the tale of the family who desires to protect its wealth and status from "people of another color," readers know the narrator does not approve of their actions. Readers realize the family is harming themselves through their fear and prejudice; they end up living in a prison of their own making; it is even called a "concentration camp." The family's decision to heed the advice of those who encourage further segregation and fear is obviously folly. The final irony occurs when the Dragon's Teeth structure that is meant to keep harmful people out ends up being so effective that it keeps their own son in, killing him in the process. 


The two primary tones that come through in this story are nervous resignation and tragic irony.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...