Sustainable food production and processing refers to a type of food system that can withstand changes in the environment and economy, and maintain or improve various aspects of food production. Sustainable food should ideally improve soil fertility, water quality, local biodiversity, living standards for farmers and other food producers, and affordability of food. Other objectives of sustainable food production and processing include increasing access to organic, local, and seasonal produce; minimizing the suffering of farm workers and animals; and improving the environment. Additionally, sustainable food systems support a variety of different forms of food production in both rural and urban contexts and provide safe and accessible food processing facilities for farmers. Sustainable food production and processing ultimately refers to a theoretical food system that would be beneficial for food producers and processors, the environment, and consumers.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment