Skip to main content

At the beginning of the Hundred Years' War, why did the English have the advantage?

To the casual observer, it might have appeared that France had the upper hand over England at the beginning of the Hundred Years' War—and for good reason. France held at its disposal the military might and the financial resources of what was at that time the largest and most populous country in all of Western Europe.


Despite France's size and power, the English were tremendously successful at the start of the Hundred Years' War thanks to their discipline and as a result of their successful use of longbows to thwart charges by the French cavalry. The combination of the English discipline and skill with longbows rendered the attacks from the less-disciplined French unsuccessful.


Because of England's success, it was able to gain victory during some significant battles during the Hundred Years' War, including the battle at Sluys in 1340, Crecy in 1346, and Poitiers in 1356.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more