Skip to main content

According to John Oliver's video on prisoner reentry, what is mass incarceration? Why does it happen? What are the causes of it? Why is this a...

Mass incarceration is the imprisonment of an historically large proportion of Americans. Today, 5% of the population is in jail, which is five times the proportion of Americans who were in prison in the 1970s. Among the causes of the mass incarceration are federal laws regarding criminal justice, including mandatory minimum sentencing laws for certain crimes. These laws were passed in response to the growth of crime in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and the political response that called for "getting tough on crime." Both major political parties, Democrats and Republicans, have passed these laws, particularly before elections, to gain favor with the public. 


The problem with this system, as John Oliver's video points out, is in part the very high rate of recidivism. This means that each year an inmate serves time in prison increases the chance he/she will commit another crime. According to the video, the national recidivism rate is 50%. That means that 50% of inmates will return to prison after being released. Released inmates are given very little money when they are released, and they also have to indicate that have been convicted of a crime on job applications, reducing the chance that they can get a job and abide by the laws governing their probation.


To fix prison systems like the one in Texas, alternatives to prison should be considered. For example, some people would do better in school programs, drug treatment centers, or mental health treatment programs. In addition, the public defender system is very poor in some states, meaning that accused people do not get a fair trial. If public defenders were better paid, the system would improve. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more