Skip to main content

According to John Oliver's video on prisoner reentry, what is mass incarceration? Why does it happen? What are the causes of it? Why is this a...

Mass incarceration is the imprisonment of an historically large proportion of Americans. Today, 5% of the population is in jail, which is five times the proportion of Americans who were in prison in the 1970s. Among the causes of the mass incarceration are federal laws regarding criminal justice, including mandatory minimum sentencing laws for certain crimes. These laws were passed in response to the growth of crime in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and the political response that called for "getting tough on crime." Both major political parties, Democrats and Republicans, have passed these laws, particularly before elections, to gain favor with the public. 


The problem with this system, as John Oliver's video points out, is in part the very high rate of recidivism. This means that each year an inmate serves time in prison increases the chance he/she will commit another crime. According to the video, the national recidivism rate is 50%. That means that 50% of inmates will return to prison after being released. Released inmates are given very little money when they are released, and they also have to indicate that have been convicted of a crime on job applications, reducing the chance that they can get a job and abide by the laws governing their probation.


To fix prison systems like the one in Texas, alternatives to prison should be considered. For example, some people would do better in school programs, drug treatment centers, or mental health treatment programs. In addition, the public defender system is very poor in some states, meaning that accused people do not get a fair trial. If public defenders were better paid, the system would improve. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more