The Weird Sisters have told Macbeth that he will become Thane of Cawdor and, later, that he will become king as well. Banquo, curious, then asks for some news for himself, and the witches tell him that he will be "Lesser than Macbeth and greater" because he is going to father a line of kings, but not be king himself (1.3.66). Because he will never be a king, he is going to be "less" than Macbeth, but because his descendants will be kings and Macbeth's won't be, he is greater than his friend. Further, the witches tell Banquo he will be "Not so happy, yet much happier" for the same reasons: he will not be so happy as to be king like Macbeth, but he will be happier in that his children will run the country (1.3.67). They finally reveal how all these paradoxes can be true when they say to him, "Thou shalt get kings, though thou be none" (1.3.68). In other words, he will never rule, but his descendants will.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment