Skip to main content

How might I write a newspaper report about what happened to the signalman from Charles Dickens' "The Signal-Man"? Why was his death was so...

As you correctly point out, the signalman dies at the end of the story, so consider writing a newspaper report from the perspective of the narrator. An interview-style report will work best for this task and there are a number of questions you might like to include.


Firstly, ask the narrator about his initial impressions of the signalman. His answer might include details about their first conversation, in which the signalman appeared distracted by the red light and had the feeling that he had met the narrator before. Include the following quote which demonstrates the signalman's sense of mystery, during this first meeting:



The monstrous thought came into my mind, as I perused the fixed eyes and the saturnine face, that this was a spirit, not a man.



Secondly, ask the narrator about his invitation to return to the signal box on the second night. Relate the details of his conversation with the signalman in which he described the appearances of the ghost and the tragic accidents which quickly followed. (This will provide the evidence to prove the existence of the ghost.) You may mention the narrator's initial skepticism, but how the strength of the signalman's despair quickly eroded this feeling and made the narrator want to help him:



His pain of mind was most pitiable to see. It was the mental torture of a conscientious man, oppressed beyond endurance by an unintelligible responsibility involving life.



Finally, ask the narrator to comment on his last visit to the signal box, when he found out that the signalman had died. Comment on the mysterious nature and the tragic irony of this event; namely, how the man who witnessed the signalman's death uttered the same words as the ghost:



Below there! Look out! Look out! For God’s sake, clear the way!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...