Skip to main content

Did the Cuban Missile Crisis overshadow the rest of Kennedy's foreign policy?

Kennedy's foreign policy and defense strategy was a complete shift from Eisenhower's reliance on nuclear deterrence.  Kennedy sought a "flexible response" that would be more inexpensive than spending the entire defense budget on missiles and bombers to deliver nuclear weapons.  Kennedy sought to increase special operations groups to fight clandestine wars against Communism.  This was the thought behind the Bay of Pigs fiasco, where anti-Castro rebels landed in Cuba in an attempt to start a revolution.  The rebels were met and captured on the beach by Castro's forces, and Kennedy looked like a laughingstock.  The Soviet Union took this opportunity to put missiles in Cuba, thus creating the tense stalemate of the Cuban Missile Crisis.  Kennedy became a national hero again when he blockaded Cuba and forced the Soviets to take the missiles out of Cuba; in reality, Kennedy struck a deal with the Soviet Union where he took American intercontinental ballistic missiles out of Turkey.  


This was Kennedy's brightest moment; to answer your question, yes, Kennedy's response during the Cuban Missile Crisis does give him a positive grade from popular historians in terms of foreign policy.  However, the situation in South Vietnam worsened as the American-backed president, Ngo Diem, was assassinated and Vietcong infiltrators started to become bolder in their attacks.  Kennedy sent more "advisers," but by 1963 these advisers were starting to get into a combat role.  This is a blemish on Kennedy's foreign policy record.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.