Skip to main content

What caused the Salem Witch Trial hysteria in 1692?

In the late 1600s, Massachusetts was heavily Puritan.  Puritan beliefs demanded moral behavior and a devotion to Christianity and the church.  Those who were different were viewed with suspicion.  This was especially true of people who held different religious beliefs, such as Quakers and Native Americans.


In 1692, two girls living in Salem Village started to experience strange fits.  They were cousins Betty Parris and Abigail Williams.  Betty was the minister's daughter and Abigail was his niece.  It was recorded that they made animal sounds, threw themselves onto the floor, and tossed objects around the house.  This behavior was highly unusual for Puritan young ladies, who were expected to be meek and respectable.  It was especially unusual for members of the minister's own family to behave in such a way.  Soon other girls in Salem Village started to experience similar fits.  It was concluded that all the girls had been bewitched.  This was given as the explanation for their strange behavior.  These girls soon started making accusations about local villagers in Salem.  They accused them of being involved with witchcraft.


The girls began acting strangely in the wintertime.  It had been a long, cold winter in Salem Village.  An earlier outbreak of smallpox had left villagers fearful.  In addition, battles were raging less than 100 miles away due to the Indian Wars.  It was a time of fear and hardship, which most likely left villagers more suspicious than normal.  They may have wanted something to blame for their hardships.


More and more people in the area were accused of bewitching the girls.  Some of the accused even made confessions.  Some of the people who were accused were fairly prominent in the local church.  Neighbors became suspicious of each other.  Tensions rose in and around Salem Village.  Eventually, the hysteria died down.  This did not, however, stop several people from being falsely hung for witchcraft.


One modern theory suggests that the girls who experienced the strange fits had eaten grain with a fungus known as ergot.  The drug LSD is derived from ergot.  One who eats grain that has been compromised by the fungus can become physically ill, and even experience hallucinations.  This would explain the strange behaviors of the girls involved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.