Skip to main content

What is Rukmani’s family background? Why did she marry Nathan?

Rukmani grew up as the fourth and youngest daughter of a village headman. During her childhood years, her father had been a man of consequence and wealth.


As a result of their father's position, Rukmani's two eldest sisters had managed to make good matches; they married well, with the requisite dowries, jewelries, and lavish wedding ceremonies expected of daughters of a village headman. By the time her third sister married, however, Rukmani discovered that her father's influence had been infinitely diminished. It was now the tax collectors who held all the power and consequence in the villages.


As a result of this change in affairs, Thangam, Rukmani's third sister, only managed to secure a modest wedding and to wed with minimal jewelry on her person. By the time Rukmani was to marry, the family could not afford a dowry at all. Without beauty and without a dowry of any sort, Rukmani was forced to marry an impoverished tenant farmer at the age of twelve. The family's poverty and lack of consequence meant that they could never hope to make a good match for Rukmani, even if they wanted to. This is why Rukmani ended up being married to Nathan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.