Skip to main content

How does the relationship among Agatha, Felix and their father compare with the relationship between Victor, Elizabeth, and Victor's father?

Both the DeLacey and the Frankenstein families are close, loving families, although Felix and Agatha are much more devoted to their father and each other than is Victor Frankenstein to his family.


Initially, in Chapter 1 of Shelley's novel, narration about the Frankenstein family describes them as in relationships that involve the one cared for and the caretaker. For instance, Alphonse Frankenstein comes "like a protecting spirit" to the rescue of Caroline Beaufort who has been orphaned by the death of her father, a true friend of the senior Frankenstein. Further, Caroline Frankenstein rescues Elizabeth Lavenza, saving her from a life of poverty, and she is received by Victor as though she is a cousin. There is love in this family; as Victor tells Walton, "Everyone loved Elizabeth."

Similarly, the DeLacey family, although having fallen upon misfortune, are a loving, caring family. The children of M. Delacey, a man who has lost his affluent social position in France and is now blind, are extremely respectful and devoted to him, and care for him as best they can; for instance, they go without food so that their father can eat, and they do what they can to cheer him and protect him. For example, when the creature enters the cottage in their absence, hoping to have human contact by speaking to M. DeLacey, they attack the creature upon their return and chase him out of the cottage, fearing that he means harm to their father.


Whereas the DeLaceys seem of all one mind, there is, however, diversity in the thinking of Victor, Elizabeth, and Alphonse Frankenstein. For one thing, a young Victor becomes greatly taken with the writings of Cornelius Agrippa, but his father tells him not to waste his time reading these writings: "...it is sad trash." Later, he rejects Agrippa, but he involves himself in yet another aspect of science of which his father would not approve as he commences upon the creation of a living being.


Of course, unlike Agatha and Felix DeLacey, Victor Frankenstein possesses a selfish pride that keeps him from preventing the death of his brother William and his cousin Elizabeth. Nor does he admit to his responsibility for these tragedies. He also does nothing to prevent Justine's condemnation, and he later places Elizabeth's life in danger by marrying her. Believing that the creature intends to kill him for having destroyed the female creature no matter what he does, Victor decides to have what little joy he can before his inevitable death. "Well, be it so," he says, and he marries Elizabeth. Unfortunately, this selfish attempt to attain some happiness results in not his death, but that of Elizabeth.


Certainly, then, the simple, loving relationships in the DeLacey family differ from the loving relationships of the Frankenstein family that become tragic because of the selfish interests of Victor.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.