Skip to main content

What quote shows how Gregor was dehumanized by his father in "The Metamorphosis"?

Some quotes that show Gregor's father has dehumanized him come from embedded flashback narration that provides (through indirect interior monologue) Gregor's memories of part of the family history. The family business had failed in the past and Gregor, with great pleasure, enthusiasm, and devotion, had at that time taken over all financial responsibility. After a while, as the indirect interior narration explains, his father's gratitude and loving appreciation faded to the point that Gregor's efforts and contributions were seen as routine, expected, and mechanical, so much so that affection was lost and Gregor's father stopped standing up to greet him during the few times he was home from traveling. Dehumanization is defined as the rendering of unique human qualities and actions as nothing more than routine and mechanical, as not human-like.



Gregor's only concern at that time had been to arrange things. . . [H]e started working especially hard, with a fiery vigour that raised him from a junior salesman to a travelling representative almost overnight. . . Gregor converted his success at work straight into cash that he could lay on the table at home. . . They had been good times and they had never come again, at least not with the same splendour. . . [The family] had even got used to it, both Gregor and the family. . . although there was no longer much warm affection given in return.


[W]hen Gregor came back from his business trips, [his father] would receive him sitting in the armchair in his nightgown when he came back in the evenings; [he] was hardly even able to stand up but, as a sign of his pleasure, would just raise his arms.



It can be argued that Gregor has been thoroughly dehumanized by his metamorphosis (his self has been dehumanized by an unknown mechanism or force). In this case, Gregor's father's reactions to his metamorphosed state are not evidence of his dehumanization of Gregor. The family, after all, hears only an animal voice. If the argument is being made that Gregor's father's post-metamorphosis actions further dehumanize Gregor, then a good quote relates to the father's initial violent reaction to the "monster" that Gregor has become, which is exhibited when he drives Gregor back into his room when Gregor impulsively goes after the fleeing chief clerk.



Gregor's father seized the chief clerk's stick in his right hand (the chief clerk had left it behind on a chair, along with his hat and overcoat), picked up a large newspaper from the table with his left, and used them to drive Gregor back into his room, stamping his foot at him as he went. . . Nothing would stop Gregor's father as he drove him back, making hissing noises at him like a wild man.



It might also be argued that the case for dehumanization Kafka is making in this story is that Gregor's employment—though productive of a rewarding income and sense of accomplishment—has dehumanized Gregor despite having given Gregor and his family, whom he loves very much, a pleasant and leisurely life to live (except for Gregor's arduous travel and demanding early hours). It can be argued that, in Kafka's eyes, though the rewards are great, the rewards do not balance the dehumanization caused by Gregor's employment conditions. Some of the conditions that dehumanize Gregor are the lonely, unpleasant hotel rooms; the office gossip that arises about him out of envy; the misconceptions the employer develops during Gregor's long absences resulting from traveling.



[I]t's very easy for a businessman like him to make mistakes about his employees. . . [W]e travellers spend almost the whole year away from the office, so that we can very easily fall victim to gossip and chance and groundless complaints, and it's almost impossible to defend yourself from that sort of thing, we don't usually even hear about them. . . we feel the harmful effects of what's been going on without even knowing what caused them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...