Skip to main content

What impact did European colonies have on Native Americans? How did the Spanish establish an empire in the Americas?

This is a very broad question.  In general, European colonization had many impacts on Native Americans.  In some cases, these were positive such as the trade relationships that were opened between the French and some Native populations in what is now Canada. In some cases, they were neutral, such as intermarriage and the spread of new cultural ideas in both directions. In some cases, they were negative, bringing epidemic diseases that wiped out Native populations and violence that forced Native populations to relocate or be overtaken by European colonizers. 


There were several factors involved in creating the Spanish empire.  One was gunpowder.  Since many of the Spanish conquerors had guns and by and large the Native populations did not, guns were not only a deadly weapon but also a factor in intimidating and psychologically overpowering populations.  Horses were another factor.  Many of the Spanish warriors were mounted on horseback.  This was both a military advantage and also a tool for manipulation, as some of the Native populations, most notably those in what is now Mexico, had legends that featured heroes or gods on horseback, so there was another tool for psychological conquest. In addition, epidemic diseases also played a role, since diseases that were common in Europe were unheard of in the New World and easily decimated populations.  Once these conquering factors had overwhelmed civilizations, as they did in many places, the tools of religious teaching/conversion and civil government (i.e. taxes and laws) were used to begin to build an empire in the Americas. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.