Skip to main content

Compare and contrast Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare as contemporary innovative dramatists

Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare were contemporaries of the age.    There are many similarities in their literary styles; so many, in fact, that it has often been speculated that Marlowe wrote some of Shakespeare’s plays.  Marlowe definitely had an influence on Shakespeare.  One of the most obvious similarities between the two was that they both wrote in blank verse.  Marlowe took the idea of blank verse common to his time and changed its conventional form to a more flexible structure known as “the Mighty Line.”  Shakespeare then perfected Marlowe’s form into the blank verse that we know in his plays today.


Both men also wrote tragedies following Aristotle’s idea of the tragic hero who has an inherent tragic flaw. Although their tragic heroes were very similar, however, there were some differences in their tragedies.  Shakespeare was very fond of using supernatural elements in his plays in order to produce mystery, but Marlowe’s plays did not contain the supernatural and were more straightforward.  Shakespeare was also known for using characters as foils (contrasts to the tragic hero to show his flaws), but Marlowe did not use this technique.  Both men also used comedy in their plays, but comic scenes in Marlowe’s plays did not contain the genuine comic relief so apparent in Shakespeare. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.