Skip to main content

Did Reconstruction help or hurt the South and why?

Depending on your point of view, Reconstruction can be viewed as harmful or helpful to the South. I will explain both points of view so you can then make a decision.


There are ways Reconstruction helped the South. Before the Civil War, the South’s economy was primarily agricultural. After the Civil War, the economy of the South became more diverse. New industries were built in the South. While the South still had a lot of farming, there were other kinds of jobs available as a result of Reconstruction. Another change is that the railroads expanded into the South as a result of Reconstruction. Before Reconstruction, most people traveled in the South by water. Most products were shipped by water. That changed after Reconstruction. African-Americans also got new freedoms and new rights. African-American males could vote, and some held political office. While some of these improvements were temporary, it was a step forward.


It could be argued that Reconstruction hurt the South. The South regressed after Reconstruction ended. The attitudes of many white southerners didn’t change. Many of the rights African-Americans had gained were eliminated or significantly curtailed. Reconstruction created a lot of resentment in the South. Many southerners believed that Reconstruction was forced upon them. They rebelled against the Republican Party and refused to vote for their candidates for many years. This led to the development of hate groups such as the KKK, which thrived in the South for a significant period of time. Some southerners believed the growth of industries ruined the southern way of life. The rural and relaxed atmosphere was changed to some degree by the expansion of industries into the South.


Now it is your turn to decide. Did Reconstruction help or hurt the South?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...