Skip to main content

Why are scientists so interested in dark matter?

Probably because there's more "dark" matter than there is "regular" matter!

We call it "dark" because we can't see it, nor can we clearly pinpoint its location by any other means; but our best theories of cosmology and astrophysics tell us that about 80% of the matter in the universe (or 25% of the total energy in the universe) is comprised of this stuff we call "dark matter". It doesn't seem to interact with most of the forces we know; in particular it's not susceptible to electromagnetism, and we don't know if it's susceptible to the nuclear forces. But it definitely is affected by---and more importantly, affects---gravity, and that's how we know it must be there.

Without dark matter, we would be unable to explain why galaxies are stable. Ordinary matter clumps too much, creating inhomogeneities in the distribution of mass that lead to tighter and tighter clumps of matter---you know many of these clumps as "stars" and "planets". But based on how fast galaxies are spinning, the orbits of those clumps of matter would become unstable, without some other source of mass to hold them in place---that other source is dark matter. Without it, we probably couldn't be here.

Another reason why scientists are so interested in it is precisely because we don't know what it is. Scientists want to find out! That's where science is most exciting---the things we don't yet understand. Dark matter wasn't predicted by our theories of particle physics, yet it keeps showing up in our theory of gravity; so what is it? Where does it come from? Whoever finally figures it out is going to be a shoo-in for the Nobel Prize.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more