Skip to main content

If the length of a wire of resistance `R` is uniformly stretched to `n` times its original value, what will be its new resistance?

I suppose that the cross sectional area `A` of the original wire is constant along its length, and the same for the stretched wire (although its cross sectional area `A'` is clearly different).


It is known and is not of big surprise that the resistance of a wire from the same material in the same conditions is directly proportional to its length `L` and is inversely proportional to its cross sectional area `A.`


It is given that the new length `L'` is `n` times greater than the original, `L'=n*L.` What about the new cross sectional area `A'?` The mass of the wire and therefore its volume must remain the same, and it is equal to `L*A = L'*A' = n*L*A'.` Hence the new area `A' = A/n,`  `n` times less, and


`(L')/(A') = (nL)/(A/n) = n^2 L/A.`


Therefore the new resistance will be `n^2` times greater than the original, `R' = n^2 R.`

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.