Skip to main content

Who are the protagonist and the antagonist in "The Passing of Grandison"?

The protagonist in Charles Waddell Chestnutt’s short story “The Passing of Grandison” is Dick Owens, also known as Richard Owens, Esq. Owens is the son of a Kentucky slave owner, and the story is set soon after the Fugitive Slave Act is passed.


The third person, limited narrator focuses on the thoughts and actions of Dick Owens, whose main goal, in his young life, is to win the love of Charity Lomax, who wants a hero for her husband and lover. She is enthralled by Owen’s recount of the trial of a young man from Ohio who assists slaves as they make their way to freedom, and sees this as an act of heroism.


Dick Owens devises a scheme to free one of his father’s slaves, Grandison. As they travel north to New York, Boston, and finally to Niagara Falls, Canada, Grandison remains loyal to his master’s son, and denounces the abolitionists who try to entice him with freedom. Ultimately, Grandison is kidnapped, although the reader is left to wonder if this is Owens' plan.


Owens returns home to marry an adoring Charity, who believes him to be her hero.


Ultimately, Grandison makes his way back to the Owens' plantation, telling stories of kidnap and torture. But it is not long before he takes his family and flees to the North to freedom. Dick’s father tracks after him but the contacts Grandison made ferry his family to safety.  


Throughout the story, Grandison gives the illusion of being opposed to the abolitionists and expresses his loyalty. But in the end he becomes the antagonist as he leaves the plantation, taking with him its precious human commodity.


It should be noted that the terms protagonist and antagonist don't suggest moral right or moral wrong; they only identify the chief actor in the story (here Owens) and the person who acts against him (here Grandison).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more