Daisy Buchanan from F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby is an intriguing character. She is, of course, beautiful, as she's commanded devotion from Gatsby for the greater part of his adult life. However, Daisy is also an extremely privileged woman and, because she is privileged, tends to be shallow and careless as well. Overall, it would appear that Daisy's chiefest concern is her own happiness, and she is hardly ever held accountable for her actions. For instance, when Daisy hits Myrtle Wilson with Gatsby's car, she readily allows Gatsby to take the blame, and also appears not to suffer very much when he is murdered as a result (she doesn't attend Gatsby's funeral). Indeed, at the end of the story, Daisy cares more for protecting herself from being implicated in Myrtle's death than she cares about Gatsby, and so she proves herself to be quite selfish.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment