Skip to main content

In regard to writing speeches that are meant to persuade others, what is considered to be the elements of persuasion you should use? I was thinking...

Ancient rhetoric was divided into five "canons," or parts:


  • Invention: finding arguments

  • Arrangement: organizing a speech into a coherent and effective whole

  • Style: using figures of speech effectively and paying close attention to word choice

  • Memory: necessary for extemporizing and also contains a storehouse of information you can use in the composing process

  • Delivery: the effectiveness of a speech or a piece of writing depends not just on what you say but on presentation

Invention itself includes the three "pisteis," or proofs. Arguments from logos should include both induction and deduction as well as take advantage of the common and special topics, which are various important argumentative strategies. The"pragmata," or facts, were considered extrinsic to rhetoric by Aristotle, but many other theorists emphasize how to use facts and other extrinsic forms of proof.


A typical classical oration consisted of six parts:


  • Introduction: intended to capture the attention and goodwill of the audience

  • Narration: sets out the facts of the case

  • Division: metadiscursive transition in which you describe what you will argue and what you will not

  • Confirmation: a section focused on proving your main thesis

  • Refutation: refutes potential counterarguments

  • Conclusion: arouses emotions  or contains a call to action

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more