Skip to main content

The Articles of Confederation created what type of system of government?

The Articles of Confederation created a confederation type of government. In a confederation form of government the states retain most of the power. When the Articles of Confederation were written, the federal government had significant limits put on what it could do. For example, the federal government couldn’t levy taxes. The federal government couldn’t make people join the military. The federal government also couldn’t resolve disputes between the states.


Because of these limits, the federal government created under the Articles of Confederation had many issues. There were financial issues. It was difficult for the government to pay its debts. It had trouble dealing with countries like Great Britain and Spain that were pushing us around and interfering with our trade. The federal government also had trouble keeping order. This was very clear when Shays’ Rebellion occurred.


Thus, the Article of Confederation created a system of government in which the federal government had limited powers while the state governments had many powers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.