Skip to main content

Does Goodman Brown really attend a witches' Sabbath, or does he dream about it?

I believe that Goodman Brown does not attend a witches' Sabbath led by the Devil.  The entire thing is a dream, and it did not really happen. 


The final paragraph of the story admits to readers that Goodman Brown did indeed dream the events that occurred in the forest. 



A stern, a sad, a darkly meditative, a distrustful, if not a desperate man did he become from the night of that fearful dream.



Nevertheless, the result of the dream is that Goodman Brown's faith in the people of his town is destroyed.  He can no longer sing hymns in church or listen attentively to the minister.  Goodman Brown even shrinks away from his wife.  He has lost his faith in Faith.  The dream is simply a very real dream to Goodman Brown.  That makes sense to me.  I've had dreams that caused me to question whether or not I dreamed the events or actually experienced the events.  


Science can explain this phenomenon.  Brain scans have been conducted on people that have been asked to perform a specific task or imagine doing the same task.  The brain scans come back identical.  In other words, the brain doesn't distinguish real from imaginary.  Dr. David Hamilton writes the following:



Chemicals including cortisol and adrenaline help kick start the body, pushing blood towards the major muscles to give you strength.


But the exact same stress response kicks in when you imagine danger, also producing cortisol and adrenaline and pushing blood around the body. The same chemistry is produced regardless of whether the danger is real or imagined.



Goodman Brown had a very vivid dream, and it became his reality. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.