Phillip and his family lived in Curacao for a little bit less than three years. I wish that I could be more specific than that, but the text is a bit vague on when Phillip and his family came to Curacao. On page 15 (of my text), Phillip tells his readers that his family arrived on the island in "late 1939." Due to the war, Phillip's family thinks that they will be safer back in the United States. Phillip's father secures them passage in early April. Unfortunately, the book doesn't give a year for that trip until the following chapter. At the beginning of chapter three, Phillip tells his readers that the ship was torpedoed on April 6, 1942. April of 1939 to April of 1942 would be three years on Curacao, but Phillip specifically said they arrived in late 1939. I think Phillip lived in Curacao for two and a half years (give or take a month).
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment