Skip to main content

What role does agriculture play in the book of Genesis?

Many of the people depicted in Genesis are farmers and sheepherders, from the very beginning. Adam and Eve lived in a garden, after all. 


When Adam and Eve were evicted from the garden, they had two sons, Cain and Abel, who were involved in agriculture. We see this from the offerings they made to God. Cain offered grain and Abel offered up one of his animals. 


Later on, Abram and Lot had to part ways because the land they were living on was not sufficient to support the herds each man had. Animal sacrifice was hugely important in the entire Old Testament, beginning with Abel. In order to be able to support a large family and to be able to offer appropriate sacrifices to God, people needed large herds. 


There are more incidents with the size of herds, such as when Laban tricked Jacob into marrying his older daughter, Leah. Jacob had to wait another seven years for Rachel and he ended up taking a large part of Laban's flock because he tricked Laban. 


The story of Joseph and the Coat of Many Colors also ends up being about agriculture. Joseph is rescued from prison because the Pharaoh has a dream that ends up being about an upcoming famine. Joseph suggests storing up grain during the seven good years that were to take place so that they would have food for the seven bad years. 


The agricultural life is one of uncertainty. Farmers are never sure what will happen next, whether it is too much rain or not enough. Animals can prosper or they can get sick and die. It is probable that the unpredictability of agricultural conditions contributed to people's desires to know God. Agriculture created both the desire and the means, through sacrifice, for worshiping God. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.