Skip to main content

What role does agriculture play in the book of Genesis?

Many of the people depicted in Genesis are farmers and sheepherders, from the very beginning. Adam and Eve lived in a garden, after all. 


When Adam and Eve were evicted from the garden, they had two sons, Cain and Abel, who were involved in agriculture. We see this from the offerings they made to God. Cain offered grain and Abel offered up one of his animals. 


Later on, Abram and Lot had to part ways because the land they were living on was not sufficient to support the herds each man had. Animal sacrifice was hugely important in the entire Old Testament, beginning with Abel. In order to be able to support a large family and to be able to offer appropriate sacrifices to God, people needed large herds. 


There are more incidents with the size of herds, such as when Laban tricked Jacob into marrying his older daughter, Leah. Jacob had to wait another seven years for Rachel and he ended up taking a large part of Laban's flock because he tricked Laban. 


The story of Joseph and the Coat of Many Colors also ends up being about agriculture. Joseph is rescued from prison because the Pharaoh has a dream that ends up being about an upcoming famine. Joseph suggests storing up grain during the seven good years that were to take place so that they would have food for the seven bad years. 


The agricultural life is one of uncertainty. Farmers are never sure what will happen next, whether it is too much rain or not enough. Animals can prosper or they can get sick and die. It is probable that the unpredictability of agricultural conditions contributed to people's desires to know God. Agriculture created both the desire and the means, through sacrifice, for worshiping God. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more