Skip to main content

How does Leiningen know the ants are approaching without seeing them?

Leiningen learns that the ants are approaching his plantation because he is told by a Brazilian official that the ants will probably reach his plantation in approximately two days.


When Leiningen hears the words of the official, he tells the man, "even a herd of saurians couldn't drive me from this plantation of mine." And, despite the official's explanation that the ants are "elemental" and an "act of God," Leiningen refuses to leave his plantation. For the past three years, he has been a planter and dealt with flood, plague, and other "acts of God." Furthermore, he prides himself on how he has triumphed over every difficulty.


Even when he sees the legions of ants that march toward his land, eating everything in their paths, Leiningen refuses to leave because he believes the human mind can surpass the limitations of insects. Indeed, he believes he can win the war against them.



The human brain needs only to become fully aware of its powers to conquer even the elements.



In addition, Leiningen has always known how to "grapple with life," and he is determined to make the most of the fight against the ants.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.