Skip to main content

What was the real reason Kikuji was asked to go to the tea ceremony in "Thousand Cranes"?

In the story, Kikuji was invited to the tea ceremony by Kurimoto Chikako, his father's (Mr. Mitani's) one-time mistress. Kurimoto invited Kikuji because she wanted him to meet a young lady who was taking ceremonial tea lessons from her. In reality, Kurimoto had arranged the miai (or prospective bride-viewing) to spite Mrs. Ota, who was also another of Mr. Mitani's mistresses.


Kurimoto's jealousy was predicated on the fact that Mr. Mitani had left her for Mrs. Ota when he was alive. Accordingly, Mr. Mitani reportedly kept Mrs. Ota as his mistress until the day he died, while Kurimoto was relegated to the background as a sexless but "convenient fixture." To act insult to injury (where Kurimoto was concerned), Mrs. Ota stayed youthful-looking and beautiful even as she, Kurimoto, struggled to embrace her ambiguous feminine identity.


When she made her invitation to Kikuji, Kurimoto understood that Mrs. Ota and her daughter would be in attendance. Nevertheless, Kurimoto reveled in her ability to upstage Mrs. Ota; she wanted to show her nemesis that she still had some influence over Kikuji's life. As if to indicate her spiteful intentions, Kurimoto used a specific tea bowl to serve Miss Inamura. Miss Inamura was the girl Kikuji was supposed to meet; she wore a thousand-crane scarf to the tea ceremony. The bowl itself had been initially owned by Mr. Ota. Upon Mr. Ota's death, the bowl was inherited by Mrs. Ota; she later gave the tea bowl to old Mr. Mitani (her lover). Mr. Mitani then gifted the bowl to Kurimoto Chikako. Essentially, Kurimoto's use of the tea bowl was a tactless move on her part.


So, the real reason Kikuji was invited to the tea ceremony had very little to do with courtesy. Kurimoto ostensibly invited Kikuji so that he could meet with Miss Inamura. However, Kurimoto's real intentions were to make Mrs. Ota jealous of the supposed influence she still has in Kikuji's life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...