Skip to main content

`int (dx)/(x(x^2 + 4)^2)` Evaluate the integral

`int (dx)/(x(x^2+4)^2)`


`= int 1/(x(x^2+4)^2)dx`


To solve, apply partial fraction decomposition. So to express the integrand as sum of proper rational expressions, set-up the equation as follows:


`1/(x(x^2+4)^2) = A/x + (Bx+C)/(x^2+4) + (Dx+E)/(x^2+4)^2`


Multiply both sides by the LCD.


`1=A(x^2+4)^2 + (Bx+C)(x)(x^2+4) + (Dx+E)(x)`


`1=Ax^4+8Ax^2+16A + Bx^4+Cx^3+4Bx^2+4Cx+Dx^2+Ex`


`1=(A+B)x^4 + Cx^3 + (8A+4B)x^2+(4C+E)x +16A`


Express the left side as polynomial with degree 4.


`0x^4 + 0x^3+0x^2+0x+1 =(A+B)x^4 + Cx^3 + (8A+4B+D)x^2+(4C+E)x +16A`


For the two sides to be equal, the coefficients of the polynomial should be the same. So set the coefficients of the two polynomials equal to each other.


x^4:


`0 = A + B `     (Let this be EQ1.)


x^3:


`0=C `     (Let this be EQ2.)


x^2:


`0=8A+4B+D`     (Let this be EQ3.)


x:


`0=4C+E `     (Let this be EQ4.)


Constant:


`1 = 16A`     (Let this be EQ5.)


Notice that the value of C is already known. So let's solve for the values of A, B, D and E.


Plug-in the value of C to EQ4.


`0=4(0) + E`


`0=E`


Isolate the A in EQ5.


`1=16A`


`1/16=A`


Then, plug-in the value of A to EQ1.


`0=1/16+B`


`-1/16=B`


And, plug-in the value of A and B to EQ3.


`0=8(1/16)+4(-1/16)+D`


`0=8/16-4/16+D`


`0=4/16+D`


`0=1/4+D`


`-1/4=D`


So the partial fraction decomposition of the integrand is:


`1/(x(x^2+4)^2) = (1/16)/x + (-1/16x+0)/(x^2+4) + (-1/4x+0)/(x^2+4)^2 = 1/(16x) -x/(16(x^2+4))-x/(4(x^2+4)^2)`


Then, proceed to take the integral of it.


`int1/(x(x^2+4)^2) dx`


`= int (1/(16x)-x/(16(x^2+4))-x/(4(x^2+4)^2))dx`


`= int 1/(16x)dx - int x/(16(x^2+4)) dx - int x/(4(x^2+4)^2)dx`


For the second and third integral, apply u-substitution method.


     `u=x^2+4`


     `du=2x dx`


     `(du)/2=xdx`


`= int 1/(16x)dx - int 1/(16u)*(du)/2 int (1/(4u^2) *(du)/2`


`= 1/16int 1/xdx - 1/32int 1/u*du -1/8int 1/u^2du`


`=1/16int 1/xdx - 1/32int 1/u*du -1/8int u^(-2)du`


`=1/6ln|x| -1/32 ln|u| +1/(8u)+C`


And, substitute back `u=x^2+4` .


`=1/16ln|x|-1/32ln|x^2+4| +1/(8(x^2+4))+C`



Therefore, `int (dx)/(x(x^2+4)^2)=1/16ln|x|-1/32ln|x^2+4| +1/(8(x^2+4))+C` .

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more