Skip to main content

Does Socrates give a convincing account of justice in the first four books of "The Republic"?

This is a very interesting question! The answer will depend upon whether you agree with Socrates' definition of justice in the first four books. Then, you will have to decide whether he adequately addresses the necessity for justice. First, let's explore his main points in all four books.


In Book One, Socrates tries to define justice. In this book, three definitions of justice are discussed. The first one (voiced by Cephalus) is the traditional Greek concept of justice: honesty in all transactions and diligence in paying off one's debts. The second definition of justice (voiced by Cephalus' son, Polemarchus) involves giving to everyone his/her just due. Thus, the enemy is owed retribution, while the friend is owed loyalty and protection.


Here, Thrasymachus chimes in and argues that these two definitions of justice are lacking. He proposes a third definition of justice that takes into account the advantage dominant individuals have over others. Thrasymachus sees the conventional definitions of justice as limiting and unnatural; he believes that true justice allows the dominant man to claim what is rightfully his. Thus, Thrasymachus proposes justice as a "might makes right" concept. Meanwhile, Socrates argues in support of the just life in the conventional sense.


In Book Two, Glaucon and Adeimantus argue that justice is sought for its benefits and that, if justice offered no practical benefits of any consequence, no one would seek it. They challenge Socrates to prove that justice should be sought for itself. So, Socrates must defend his belief that people are happier being just than unjust. He proceeds to show how a just city can be used as an analogy to describe the benefits of being a just individual. In Socrates' fictionalized just city, every individual knows his/her place. In order to protect this "good" society, warriors must be stationed around it. These soldiers are to be carefully chosen and carefully taught the rudiments of being good warriors. They must be gentle with the innocent and absolutely ruthless with the enemy.


In Book Three, Socrates maintains that these soldiers or "auxiliaries" must be well-educated in order to preside over and to protect a just city. The auxiliaries themselves must be just; they must read only poetry or works that promote self-discipline, humility, honesty, and obedience. Above all, they must receive adequate training in the arts of war. Socrates also proposes that the rulers or "guardians" of the just city should be chosen from the auxiliary class. Ultimately, Socrates' point is that a just society is made up of just individuals.


In Book Four, Socrates continues to argue that a just life is a happy life, regardless of whether it brings about practical or material benefits. In this book, Socrates proposes that a just city is ruled by three important elements: wisdom, courage, and self-discipline. Thus,  for a city to be just, wisdom must rest in its ruling (guardian) class, courage must rest in its warrior (auxiliary) class, and self-restraint must rest in its citizen (producer) class. Justice is thus rendered when each class performs its prescribed functions to perfection.


Socrates then equates the just city to the just individual, wherein resides the three concepts of wisdom, courage, and self-discipline in harmony. To Socrates, a just soul is a balanced soul (and also a happy one).


So, there you have it! Now, you must decide whether Socrates gives a convincing account of justice. Do you agree with his hypothesis that justice should be sought for itself rather than for its practical benefits? Essentially, do you agree with Socrates' argument that a just soul is a happy soul, regardless of time, place, or circumstance? Your answer to these two questions will decide your response to your original question.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more