Skip to main content

On a smooth surface, a mass `m_1=2 kg` is attached to the first object by a spring with spring constant `k_1=4 N/m` . Another mass `m_2=1 kg` is...

The force on block 1 from the first spring is


`F_1=-k_1x`


Where `x` is the position to the right of the equilibrium position. Let y be the distance to the right of block 2's equilibrium position. Then the second spring exerts a force `F_2` on block 1 given by


`F_2=k_2(y-x)`


Think about it. If `x=y` there should be no force from spring 2. Also if `ygtx` then there should be a pull to the right (positive) on block 1. If `xlty` then the block should pull to the left (negative).


Since block 2 is only attached to spring 2, from Newton's third law


`F_3=-F2=-k_2(y-x)`


Now apply Newton's second law to both the blocks.


`m_1 (d^2x)/dt^2=F_1+F_2=-k_1x+k_2(y-x)`


`m_2 (d^2y)/dt^2=F_3=-k_2(y-x)`


Plug in the values for `k` and `m` , then move the terms to the left hand side.


`2(d^2x)/dt^2+6x-2y=0`


`(d^2y)/dt^2+2y-2x=0`


I'm going to set let `D:=d/dt` and solve this system of equations by the elimination method.


`(1):-gt (2D^2+6)x-2y=0`


`(2):-gt (D^2+2)y-2x=0`


Now multiply eq. `(1)` by `(D^2+2)` and multiply eq. `(2)` by `2` .


`(1):-gt(D^2+2)(2D^2+6)x-2(D^2+2)y=0`


`(2):-gt 2(D^2+2)y-4x=0`


Add eq. `(1)` and eq. `(2)` together to eliminate `y`


`(D^2+2)(2D^2+6)x-2(D^2+2)y+2(D^2+2)y-4x=0 `

`2D^4x+6D^2x+4D^2x+12x-2D^2y-4y+2D^2y+4y-4x=0`


`2D^4x+10D^2x+8x=0`


`(3):-gt 2(d^4x)/(dt^4)+10(d^2x)/(dt^2)+8x=0`


Try a solution of the form `x(t)=e^(rt)` .


Then eq. `(3)` takes the form


`2(r^4+5r^2+4)e^(rt)=0`


Solve for the roots of this characteristic equation.


`(r^4+5r^2+4)=0`


`(r^2+1)(r^2+4)=0`


The roots are `r=i, -i, 2i, -2i` .


Using Euler's formula, it follows that two linearly independent solutions are


`z_1(t)=e^(it)=cos(t)+isin(t)`


`z_2(t)=e^(2it)=cos(2t)+isin(2t)`


The general solution is a superposition of the imaginary and real parts of the linearly independent solutions.



`x(t)=a_1cos(t)+a_2sin(t)+a_3cos(2t)+a_4sin(2t) `

To find `y(t)` use earlier equation to put `y` in terms  of `x` ,


`2(d^2x)/dt^2+6x-2y=0`


`y(t)=(d^2x)/dt^2+3x`


Differentiate the general solution for `x(t)` twice and plug it in. You will find


`y(t)=2a_1cos(t)+2a_2sin(t)-a_3cos(2t)-a_4sin(2t)`


To determine the coefficients apply the initial conditions:


`x(0)=3`


`(dx)/(dt)=0`


`y(0)=3`


`(dy)/(dt)=0`


This will yield a system of 4 equations. You should find that,


`x(t)=2cos(t)+cos(2t)`


`y(t)=4cos(t)-cos(2t)`



x(t) is in black and y(t) in red.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.